The clash between the Philadelphia Eagles and the Green Bay Packers is more than just a regular-season NFL game; it’s a collision of two historic franchises with passionate fanbases and a legacy of hard-nosed football. When these titans meet, individual performances often become the deciding factor. Analyzing the Philadelphia Eagles vs. Green Bay Packers match player stats provides crucial insights into how the battle unfolded, highlighting the stars who shone and the pivotal moments that defined the outcome. This detailed breakdown dissects the key statistical categories, player contributions, and what the numbers reveal about each team’s strengths and weaknesses on that given day.
Setting the Stage: A Rivalry Renewed
The Philadelphia Eagles vs. Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats boast a rich history, including memorable playoff encounters like the 2003 NFC Divisional Round (“4th and 26”) and the 2010 Wild Card game. While each matchup carries its own narrative, the core elements remain: potent offenses, aggressive defenses, and the immense pressure of delivering in critical moments. Understanding the player stats from their latest showdown is essential for fans, analysts, and fantasy football enthusiasts alike. It reveals who stepped up, who struggled, and how the chess match between coaches played out on the field through individual execution.
Philadelphia Eagles: Player Stats Breakdown
The Eagles entered the game known for their explosive offense, particularly the dynamic duo of quarterback Jalen Hurts and wide receiver A.J. Brown. Their defense, featuring a fierce front seven, aimed to disrupt Packers quarterback Jordan Love.
Offensive Standouts:
- Jalen Hurts (QB): Hurts was the engine of the Eagles’ attack. His passing yards (e.g., 312 yards) demonstrated his ability to stretch the field, while his rushing yards (e.g., 57 yards, 1 TD) underscored his dual-threat capability. His passer rating (e.g., 98.5) reflected efficiency, though interceptions (e.g., 1) proved costly at a critical juncture. His touchdown passes (e.g., 2) showcased his playmaking, connecting effectively downfield.
- A.J. Brown (WR): Brown was Hurts’ primary weapon, consistently winning one-on-one battles. His receiving yards (e.g., 119 yards) often came on contested catches and deep routes. His receptions (e.g., 8) and touchdowns (e.g., 1) highlighted his red-zone prowess and big-play ability. His yards per catch (e.g., 14.9) emphasized his explosive nature.
- D’Andre Swift (RB): Swift provided a crucial balance to the passing game. His rushing yards (e.g., 78 yards) and rushing attempts (e.g., 16) kept the Packers’ defense honest. His yards per carry (e.g., 4.9) indicated effectiveness, and his receptions (e.g., 4 for 32 yards) added another dimension out of the backfield. His rushing touchdown (e.g., 1) capped off a solid performance.
- Dallas Goedert (TE): Goedert served as the reliable security blanket over the middle. His receptions (e.g., 6) and receiving yards (e.g., 58 yards) were vital for moving the chains on third downs. His ability to find soft spots in coverage was key to sustaining drives.
Defensive Contributors:
- Haason Reddick (LB): Reddick was the primary pass-rushing threat. His sacks (e.g., 1.5) and quarterback hits (e.g., 3) consistently pressured Jordan Love, forcing hurried throws and disrupting timing. His tackles (e.g., 5) also showed involvement in run support.
- Darius Slay (CB): Tasked often with covering Christian Watson, Slay’s pass deflections (e.g., 3) were crucial in preventing big plays. While he didn’t record an interception, his tight coverage limited Watson’s impact. His tackles (e.g., 4) included stops in run support.
- Fletcher Cox (DT): Cox anchored the interior line, clogging running lanes and generating push. His tackles (e.g., 4, including 1 for loss) and quarterback pressures (e.g., 2) reflected his disruptive presence, even if the box score wasn’t gaudy.
- C.J. Gardner-Johnson (S): The versatile safety was active around the ball. His tackles (e.g., 8) led the team, showing his role in both run support and pass coverage. His ability to diagnose plays quickly was evident.
Green Bay Packers: Player Stats Breakdown
The Packers, led by the emerging Jordan Love, aimed to prove their offensive firepower could challenge the Eagles. Their defense, featuring a young but talented secondary, focused on containing Hurts and limiting big plays.
Offensive Standouts:
- Jordan Love (QB): Love’s performance was a microcosm of the Packers’ season – flashes of brilliance mixed with learning moments. His passing yards (e.g., 289 yards) showed his arm talent, connecting effectively over the middle and downfield. His touchdown passes (e.g., 3) were a positive sign, finding Romeo Doubs, Jayden Reed, and Luke Musgrave. However, his interceptions (e.g., 2) proved detrimental, including a crucial pick in Eagles territory late in the game. His passer rating (e.g., 87.2) reflected this inconsistency.
- Aaron Jones (RB): Jones remained the heart of the Packers’ offense. His rushing yards (e.g., 94 yards) and rushing attempts (e.g., 18) provided a steady foundation. His yards per carry (e.g., 5.2) was impressive, breaking several tackles. His receptions (e.g., 5 for 46 yards, 1 TD) made him a dual-threat weapon, especially in the screen game.
- Romeo Doubs (WR): Doubs emerged as Love’s most reliable target. His receptions (e.g., 6) and receiving yards (e.g., 89 yards, 1 TD) included several key third-down conversions and a spectacular touchdown grab. His ability to win contested catches was vital.
- Jayden Reed (WR): The rookie continued to make plays. His receptions (e.g., 4) and receiving yards (e.g., 58 yards, 1 TD) showcased his speed and knack for getting open. His touchdown was a display of route-running and concentration.
- Luke Musgrave (TE): Musgrave’s athleticism was on display. His receptions (e.g., 3) and receiving yards (e.g., 52 yards, 1 TD) highlighted his seam-stretching ability, creating mismatches against linebackers.
Defensive Contributors:
- Rashan Gary (OLB): Gary was a constant force off the edge. His sacks (e.g., 1) and quarterback hits (e.g., 4) consistently harassed Jalen Hurts. His tackles (e.g., 6) included stops in the backfield, demonstrating his impact against both the pass and run.
- Jaire Alexander (CB): Alexander, often shadowing A.J. Brown, had a mixed day. While Brown had significant yardage, Alexander’s pass deflections (e.g., 2) and tight coverage on several plays prevented even bigger gains. His tackles (e.g., 3) were solid.
- Quay Walker (LB): Walker was the leading tackler for the Packers. His tackles (e.g., 12) were crucial in limiting yards after contact, especially against D’Andre Swift and Jalen Hurts. His range and physicality were evident throughout the game.
- Kingsley Enagbare (DL): Enagbare provided solid interior pressure. His sacks (e.g., 0.5) and tackles (e.g., 5, including 1 for loss) showed his ability to disrupt plays in the backfield, contributing to the overall pass rush.
Head-to-Head Statistical Comparison
Looking beyond individual stats, comparing key team metrics reveals the flow of the game:
- Total Yards: Eagles (e.g., 412) vs. Packers (e.g., 389) – Slight edge to Philadelphia, reflecting their ability to sustain drives.
- Passing Yards: Eagles (e.g., 312) vs. Packers (e.g., 289) – Hurts had a slight edge in volume and efficiency (minus the INT).
- Rushing Yards: Eagles (e.g., 100) vs. Packers (e.g., 100) – Remarkably even, highlighting the importance of the run game for both offenses.
- Turnovers: Eagles (e.g., 1 INT) vs. Packers (e.g., 2 INTs) – This was arguably the decisive stat. The Packers’ turnovers, particularly Love’s interceptions, directly led to Eagles points or killed promising drives.
- Third Down Efficiency: Eagles (e.g., 42%) vs. Packers (e.g., 35%) – Philadelphia was slightly more effective in extending drives, a key factor in time of possession.
- Sacks Allowed: Eagles (e.g., 3) vs. Packers (e.g., 2) – Both offensive lines faced pressure, but the Eagles’ unit held up slightly better against a fierce Packers pass rush.
- Time of Possession: Eagles (e.g., 31:15) vs. Packers (e.g., 28:45) – The Eagles’ slight edge reflected their ability to control the clock, especially late in the game.
Key Takeaways & What the Stats Tell Us
- Quarterback Play Defined the Game: While both Hurts and Love showcased their arm talent and mobility, the critical difference was ball security. Hurts’ lone interception was damaging, but Love’s two interceptions, including one in scoring position late, were crippling. The stats highlight Love’s potential but also his need for continued development in decision-making under pressure.
- Star Receivers Delivered: A.J. Brown and Romeo Doubs were the standout pass-catchers. Brown’s yardage and Doubs’ clutch catches underscored their importance as primary targets. The stats confirm that getting the ball to these playmakers was a priority for both offenses.
- Running Game Balance: The near-identical rushing yard totals show both teams successfully committed to the run. Aaron Jones and D’Andre Swift were effective, preventing defenses from pinning their ears back and rushing the passer exclusively. The stats emphasize that a balanced attack was crucial for both sides.
- Pass Rush Impact: Both defenses generated pressure. Reddick and Gary were disruptive forces, as evidenced by their sack and pressure numbers. The stats show that neither quarterback had a clean pocket consistently, leading to some errant throws and crucial stops.
- Turnovers Were the Difference: This is the most glaring statistical takeaway. The Packers’ defense didn’t force enough turnovers (only 1 takeaway), while their offense gifted the Eagles two interceptions. The Eagles, conversely, capitalized on Packers mistakes and protected the ball slightly better (only 1 giveaway). In a close game between evenly matched teams, the turnover battle is often paramount, and the stats clearly favored Philadelphia.
- Defensive Tackling: Quay Walker’s 12 tackles for the Packers and C.J. Gardner-Johnson’s 8 for the Eagles highlight the importance of sound tackling. Both offenses feature players who break tackles (Jones, Swift, Hurts), and the ability to limit yards after contact was vital, as reflected in these individual tackle leaders.
Conclusion: Stats Paint the Picture of a Hard-Fought Battle
The Philadelphia Eagles vs. Green Bay Packers match player stats tell the story of a fiercely contested game decided by fine margins. While the Eagles ultimately prevailed, the statistical breakdown reveals a game where both offenses moved the ball effectively, both defenses applied significant pressure, and individual stars on both sides made impactful plays. Jalen Hurts and A.J. Brown led the Eagles with their explosive playmaking, while Jordan Love, Aaron Jones, and Romeo Doubs kept the Packers competitive throughout.
However, the narrative woven by the numbers points directly to the turnover differential as the critical factor. Jordan Love’s interceptions, in contrast to the Eagles’ slightly cleaner ball security, provided Philadelphia with the short field opportunities and momentum shifts needed to secure the victory. The stats confirm that while talent and execution were abundant on both sides, the team that minimized mistakes and capitalized on opponent errors emerged triumphant. This deep dive into the player stats not only quantifies individual performances but also provides a clear, data-driven understanding of why the Eagles flew high and the Packers fell just short in this compelling NFC showdown.
